Skip to Main Content

Paper Details

Comparison of Proteomic Assessment Methods in Multiple Cohort Studies.
Proteomics
84
2020
Author NameAffiliation
Laura M RaffieldUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Clary B ClishBroad Institute
Clary B ClishBroad Institute
Elaine CornellLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont
Peter DurdaLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont
Xiuqing GuoThe Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Harbor-university of california los angeles Medical Center
W Craig JohnsonUniversity of Washington
Yongmei LiuWake Forest School of Medicine
George J PapanicolaouLung and Blood Institute
Kent D TaylorThe Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Harbor-university of california los angeles Medical Center
Stephen S RichCenter for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia
Stephen S RichThe Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Harbor-university of california los angeles Medical Center
Paul L AuerZilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
Alexander P ReinerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Alexander P ReinerUniversity of Washington
Russell P TracyLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont
Russell P TracyLarner College of Medicine, University of Vermont
Robert E GersztenBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Wanda K O'NealMarsico Lung Institute , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 1 - 19

Datasets