Skip to Main Content

Author Details

Penny Whiting
University of Bristol
2000
124
51
PMIDPaper TitleJournal TitlePublished Year
37925059Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed.J Clin Epidemiol2024
36916896How to Critically Appraise and Interpret Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy: A User Guide.Radiology2023
36601438[The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsDeclaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas].Rev Panam Salud Publica2022
35508322Why Test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the Primary Care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT) to explore the reasons for primary care testing.BJGP Open2022
35696685QUAPAS: An Adaptation of the QUADAS-2 Tool to Assess Prognostic Accuracy Studies.Ann Intern Med2022
33187808Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies Evaluating Point-of-Care Tests of Coagulopathy in Cardiac Surgery.Transfus Med Rev2021
33789826The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.Int J Surg2021
33789819The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.J Clin Epidemiol2021
33782057The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ2021
33781993PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ2021
33781348The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.Syst Rev2021
33780438The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PLoS Med2021
33722791Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration.BMJ2021
34635854A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI.Nat Med2021
34695139The accuracy of diagnostic indicators for coeliac disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One2021
34158286Interpreting a lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen test.BMJ2021
34183345Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol.BMJ Open2021
34168027Methodological review to develop a list of bias items used to assess reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: protocol and rationale.BMJ Open2021
32398230Interpreting a covid-19 test result.BMJ2020
33143712At what times during infection is SARS-CoV-2 detectable and no longer detectable using RT-PCR-based tests? A systematic review of individual participant data.BMC Med2020
33060080Raised inflammatory markers as a predictor of one-year mortality: a cohort study in primary care in the UK using electronic health record data.BMJ Open2020
33278890GP's perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice.BMC Fam Pract2020
33208126A systematically collated library of prescribing safety indicators for people with chronic kidney disease.BMC Nephrol2020
32798714Risk of bias assessment of test comparisons was uncommon in comparative accuracy systematic reviews: an overview of reviews.J Clin Epidemiol2020
33020103Accuracy of potential diagnostic indicators for coeliac disease: a systematic review protocol.BMJ Open2020
32820328What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review.Fam Pract2020
32816740Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist.BMJ2020
32416338Agreement was moderate between data-based and opinion-based assessments of biases affecting randomized trials within meta-analyses.J Clin Epidemiol2020
30510095Exposure to domestic violence and abuse and consultations for emergency contraception: nested case-control study in a UK primary care dataset.Br J Gen Pract2019
31390032Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open2019
31558523Authors' response.Br J Gen Pract2019
31208976Added value and cascade effects of inflammatory marker tests in UK primary care: a cohort study from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.Br J Gen Pract2019
31208975Use of multiple inflammatory marker tests in primary care: using Clinical Practice Research Datalink to evaluate accuracy.Br J Gen Pract2019
31462531RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.BMJ2019
31573906Digital Health Professions Education in the Field of Pediatrics: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.J Med Internet Res2019
31196976Are guidelines for monitoring chronic disease in primary care evidence based?BMJ2019
31634375Can non-pharmacological interventions reduce hospital admissions in people with dementia? A systematic review.PLoS One2019
30842204Distributions of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) across a healthcare system following a large-scale roll-out.Emerg Med J2019
31015558Predictive value of inflammatory markers for cancer diagnosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study using electronic health records.Br J Cancer2019
31005925The utility of diagnostic selective nerve root blocks in the management of patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a systematic review.BMJ Open2019
30829576Digital Education for Health Professions on Smoking Cessation Management: Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.J Med Internet Res2019
30762583Digital Education in Health Professions: The Need for Overarching Evidence Synthesis.J Med Internet Res2019
30596876PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.Ann Intern Med2019
30596875PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies.Ann Intern Med2019
29209836Accuracy of cystatin C for the detection of abnormal renal function in children undergoing chemotherapy for malignancy: a systematic review using individual patient data.Support Care Cancer2018
30253777Use of emergency contraception among women with experience of domestic violence and abuse: a systematic review.BMC Womens Health2018
30036677Guidance was developed on how to write a plain language summary for diagnostic test accuracy reviews.J Clin Epidemiol2018
30171976Can early warning scores identify deteriorating patients in pre-hospital settings? A systematic review.Resuscitation2018
30303184[ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.].Recenti Prog Med2018
30303186ROBIS: strumento per valutare il rischio di bias nelle revisioni sistematiche.Recenti Prog Med2018
  • 1 - 50 of 124

Recommended Authors

Harvard Medical School, Harvard University
Career Start Year 2018
Number of shared co-authors 0
Mayo Clinic
Career Start Year 2011
Number of shared co-authors 1
Loyola University
Career Start Year 2010
Number of shared co-authors 0
Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute
Career Start Year 2010
Number of shared co-authors 0
McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Career Start Year 2009
Number of shared co-authors 0
University Health Network
Career Start Year 2008
Number of shared co-authors 1
Mayo Clinic
Career Start Year 2007
Number of shared co-authors 1
Mayo Clinic Libraries
Career Start Year 2006
Number of shared co-authors 1
Mayo Clinic
Career Start Year 2004
Number of shared co-authors 1
Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
Career Start Year 2003
Number of shared co-authors 0
Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health
Career Start Year 2002
Number of shared co-authors 3
Johns Hopkins University
Career Start Year 2000
Number of shared co-authors 3
Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Career Start Year 1998
Number of shared co-authors 0
Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology (KER_Endo), Mayo Clinic
Career Start Year 1998
Number of shared co-authors 2
Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
Career Start Year 1998
Number of shared co-authors 3
Viatris Inc.
Career Start Year 1997
Number of shared co-authors 0
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Career Start Year 1995
Number of shared co-authors 3
Stanford University
Career Start Year 1994
Number of shared co-authors 9
University Health Network
Career Start Year 1994
Number of shared co-authors 2
Virginia Commonwealth University
Career Start Year 1993
Number of shared co-authors 4
Leiden University Medical Center
Career Start Year 1992
Number of shared co-authors 7
Rutgers University School of Public Health
Career Start Year 1988
Number of shared co-authors 6
University of Otago
Career Start Year 1986
Number of shared co-authors 1
Tufts University School of Medicine
Career Start Year 1986
Number of shared co-authors 1
Mayo Clinic
Career Start Year 1985
Number of shared co-authors 0
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
Career Start Year 1985
Number of shared co-authors 1
university of california san diego
Career Start Year 1983
Number of shared co-authors 0
Oregon Health & Science University
Career Start Year 1983
Number of shared co-authors 7
Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University
Career Start Year 1975
Number of shared co-authors 1

Collaborators

University of Bristol
Co-authored papers 26
University of Amsterdam
Co-authored papers 19
University of Ottawa
Co-authored papers 11
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham
Co-authored papers 10
Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam
Co-authored papers 10
University College London (UCL)
Co-authored papers 9
Co-authored papers 8
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program
Co-authored papers 6
University of Oxford
Co-authored papers 5
Co-authored papers 5
University of Oxford
Co-authored papers 4
Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris Cite University
Co-authored papers 4
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Trecht University
Co-authored papers 3
School of Public Health, Imperial College London
Co-authored papers 2
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Co-authored papers 2
University of Leeds
Co-authored papers 2
Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust
Co-authored papers 2
Institute for Health Informatics, University College London
Co-authored papers 2
Co-authored papers 2
School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
Co-authored papers 2
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Co-authored papers 2
University of Oxford
Co-authored papers 2
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Co-authored papers 2
Imperial College London
Co-authored papers 2
Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust
Co-authored papers 2
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Co-authored papers 2
Oregon Health & Science University
Co-authored papers 2
Google Health.
Co-authored papers 2
Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust
Co-authored papers 2
Stanford University
Co-authored papers 1