Skip to Main Content

Author Details

David F Ransohoff
1976
177
68
PMIDPaper TitleJournal TitlePublished Year
36745894In adults, sigmoidoscopy screening invitation reduced CRC incidence and related mortality at 15 y.2023
37463757An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles.Gut2023
36745897In adults, a single colonoscopy screening invitation vs. no invitation reduced CRC incidence at 10 y.2023
34545024New scoring systems for predicting advanced proximal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults with or without knowing distal colorectal findings: a prospective, cross-sectional study.European Journal of Cancer Prevention2022
35134969Counting Advanced Precancerous Lesions as True Positives When Determining Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Specificity.J Natl Cancer Inst2022
32761203Evaluating a New Cancer Screening Blood Test: Unintended Consequences and the Need for Clarity in Policy Making.Journal of the National Cancer Institute2021
32994311Derivation and validation of a predictive model for advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.Gut2021
31563625Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies.Gastroenterology2020
30721924Meeting report from the joint IARC-NCI international cancer seminar series: a focus on colorectal cancer.Ann Oncol2019
30165051Mortality From Postscreening (Interval) Colorectal Cancers Is Comparable to That From Cancer in Unscreened Patients-A Randomized Sigmoidoscopy Trial.Gastroenterology2018
27582444Risk of Advanced Neoplasia Using the National Cancer Institute's Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool.Journal of the National Cancer Institute2017
28425279Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia.New England Journal of Medicine2017
27882502Institutional Responsibility and the Flawed Genomic Biomarkers at Duke University: A Missed Opportunity for Transparency and Accountability.Sci Eng Ethics2017
27042931Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials.Endoscopy2016
27304798Clinical Practice Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening: New Recommendations and New Challenges.JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association2016
26926450Reply.Gastroenterology2016
26420882Predictive Value Tools as an Aid in Chemopreventive Agent Development.Journal of the National Cancer Institute2015
25688116Leveraging biospecimen resources for discovery or validation of markers for early cancer detection.J Natl Cancer Inst2015
25560730Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.Ann Intern Med2015
26259154Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System to Stratify Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.Annals of Internal Medicine2015
24645800Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.New England Journal of Medicine2014
24333512Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology2014
23408352Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancer.Gut2014
24807866Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change.Lancet Oncol2014
25006736Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.New England Journal of Medicine2014
24560454What is the effect of more sensitive diagnostic technology?Lancet Oncology, The2014
23652517Development of trustworthy practice guidelines--reply.JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association2013
23903752Breaking a vicious cycle.Sci Transl Med2013
24063748Statistical design for biospecimen cohort size in proteomics-based biomarker discovery and verification studies.J Proteome Res2013
23752106Guidelines for guidelines: measuring trustworthiness.Journal of Clinical Oncology2013
23299601How to decide whether a clinical practice guideline is trustworthy.JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association2013
23462919Cultivating cohort studies for observational translational research.Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention2013
23462917Transforming epidemiology for 21st century medicine and public health.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2013
23212726European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication.Endoscopy2013
23660420Colon cancer screening models: lessons and challenges.Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology2013
23412608How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases?Genet Med2013
22256806Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women.N Engl J Med2012
22586009Risk for colorectal cancer in persons with a family history of adenomatous polyps: a systematic review.Annals of Internal Medicine2012
22539065Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians.Journal of General Internal Medicine2012
24451831Why Hasn't Genomic Testing Changed the Landscape in Clinical Oncology?Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book2012
23062404Tailoring colorectal cancer screening by considering risk of advanced proximal neoplasia.American Journal of Medicine2012
21698368Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice.Digestive Diseases and Sciences2011
21434890Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.Eur J Clin Invest2011
21424820Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.Eur J Epidemiol2011
21372037A framework for evaluating biomarkers for early detection: validation of biomarker panels for ovarian cancer.Cancer Prev Res (Phila)2011
21414753Strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.J Clin Epidemiol2011
21364690Biomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registry.Nat Rev Clin Oncol2011
21407270Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.Eur J Hum Genet2011
21757648Using models to make policy: an inflection point?Medical Decision Making2011
21757647Cross-model comparisons to improve the value of modeling: the case of colorectal cancer screening.Medical Decision Making2011
  • 1 - 50 of 177

Recommended Authors

Collaborators

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta GA USA.
Co-authored papers 10
National Institutes of Health
Co-authored papers 7
Stanford University
Co-authored papers 7
Co-authored papers 6
Co-authored papers 6
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
Co-authored papers 5
National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr
Co-authored papers 5
Duke University Medical Center
Co-authored papers 4
Co-authored papers 4
Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health
Co-authored papers 4
Co-authored papers 4
Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute
Co-authored papers 4
Co-authored papers 4
Co-authored papers 4
University of Oxford
Co-authored papers 4
Co-authored papers 4
Co-authored papers 4
University of Exeter, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Co-authored papers 4
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Co-authored papers 4
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Co-authored papers 4
National Cancer Institute
Co-authored papers 3
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Co-authored papers 3
Co-authored papers 3
Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg
Co-authored papers 3
Co-authored papers 3
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Co-authored papers 3
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
Co-authored papers 3
Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute
Co-authored papers 3
University of California San Francisco
Co-authored papers 3
Stanford University School of Medicine
Co-authored papers 2